01
Pick a topic
Choose one of the Investigating Science topics above or type your own, then pick your state. WACE, VCE, HSC, QCE and SACE each word their questions differently, and the paper follows yours.
02
Attempt it yourself
Exam-style questions with the mark allocation showing, so you know how much to write. You answer them — nothing is handed to you.
A news article claims that a supplement improves memory, citing a study of 20 volunteers who took it and reported feeling sharper. Evaluate the reliability and validity of this claim. (6 marks)
03
Get it marked
Your answer comes back marked criterion by criterion in seconds — what you earned, what you half-earned, and what the examiner never saw.
4/6 · ✓ Identifies the small sample as a limit on reliability
04
Fix the gap
The topics you keep losing marks on come back around in your review until they're strong. That's the whole point.
observation versus inference
Choose your system
WACEVCEHSCQCESACE
Then your topic
observation versus inferencecorrelation and causationvalidity, reliability and accuracysystematic and random error
A news article claims that a supplement improves memory, citing a study of 20 volunteers who took it and reported feeling sharper. Evaluate the reliability and validity of this claim. (6 marks)
Investigating Science · HSC
Marked in seconds
✓ Identifies the small sample as a limit on reliability
✓ Identifies self-report as an invalid measure of the dependent variable
✕ Names the missing control or placebo group as the key design flaw
✕ Reaches an explicit judgement on whether the claim is supported
Weak topics, resurfacing
observation versus inference
correlation and causation
validity, reliability and accuracy